Who has made a beer with only FWH?
#1
Posted 06 July 2015 - 08:25 AM
#2
Posted 06 July 2015 - 08:27 AM
I have done it years back when I did my own FWH vs. 60 min, test.
#3
Posted 06 July 2015 - 08:31 AM
I have done it years back when I did my own FWH vs. 60 min, test.
What were your findings?
I do love the simplicity of FWH'ing but I rarely do it.
#4
Posted 06 July 2015 - 08:34 AM
#5
Posted 06 July 2015 - 09:37 AM
I was reading the new FWH Exbeeriment on Brulosophy and wondered about making a beer where all the hops were FWH. The results of his test, btw, were that it was tough for the tasters to determine which beer was the FWH. I seem to get a very distinct character when I FWH and I really enjoy it. But I usually do a FWH plus a 60-minutes addition. Obviously this would only apply to a small range of styles... helles, maybe festbier, dunkel, etc.
it might be nice for a blonde or stout as well.
#6
Posted 06 July 2015 - 09:52 AM
#7
Posted 06 July 2015 - 10:33 AM
What were your findings?
I do love the simplicity of FWH'ing but I rarely do it.
Start on pg. 29....https://www.ahaconfe...8/DennyConn.pdf
I ask this question mainly to know what anyone did in terms of the size of the addition, how you determined what the final IBUs might be, etc. I am totally in line with the findings of the Exbeeriment and I enjoy reading them very much. I have never done any side-by-side comparisons or anything close to "research" as he has done. But I do seem to really enjoy the beers I FWH. Maybe it's a mental thing and I just know that I did a FWH so I think the beer is better. I could see punching a recipe into Tastybrew and assume it will calculate the IBUs correctly.
I FWH probably about 80% of my beers...everything from tripel to German pils to IPA. I count them as the same amount of IBU as a 20 min. addition simply because that's what it tastes like to me.
#8
Posted 06 July 2015 - 10:40 AM
Start on pg. 29....https://www.ahaconfe...8/DennyConn.pdf
I FWH probably about 80% of my beers...everything from tripel to German pils to IPA. I count them as the same amount of IBU as a 20 min. addition simply because that's what it tastes like to me.
Thanks, that was helpful.
#9
Posted 06 July 2015 - 10:47 AM
I've never done enough side by side to tell but maybe I should start FWHing more often.
#10
Posted 06 July 2015 - 11:11 AM
I've done a lot with FWH as the only addition. My perception is a bit more aroma and a smoother bitterness than a 60 minute addition with late additions. It certainly does simplify the boil.
#11
Posted 06 July 2015 - 06:29 PM
I FWH just about everything and FWH-only some beers. I can't remember the last time I actually used a 60' hop addition.
I used to reduce the IBU expectation, but now I keep it at the 60 minute contribution. Perhaps that works because I'm not looking for a lot of bitterness and I'm using low alpha hops. I used to recommend the 20' adjustment, but a couple intentionally bitter beers came out a little over the top. A smooth bitterness, but more than I would have expected from a 20' addition.
Edited by Brauer, 06 July 2015 - 06:31 PM.
#12
Posted 06 July 2015 - 06:31 PM
I FWH just about everything and FWH-only some beers. I used to reduce the IBU expectation, but now I keep it at the 60 minute contribution. Perhaps that works because I'm not looking for a lot of bitterness and I'm using low alpha hops, typically. I used to recommend the 20' adjustment, but some intentionally bitter beer came out a little over the top. A smooth bitterness, but more than I would have expected from a 20' addition.
I did a 20 minute only addition for a hoppy Am Wheat on Friday just to compare since I had not done one in a long time.
#13
Posted 06 July 2015 - 06:34 PM
I did a 20 minute only addition for a hoppy Am Wheat on Friday just to compare since I had not done one in a long time.
Yeah, it's been a while since I made one where I didn't start hopping until 20'. I seem to remember that I liked them. Should be fun.
#14
Posted 07 July 2015 - 07:28 PM
#15
Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:09 AM
In case you didn't notice it, there was a flaw in Marshall's experiment. He added extra hops to the non FWH to account for the supposed IBU difference.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users