I thought Vinny's recipe called for more carapils than that, then again systems, tastes and whatnot. Should be a good WCDIPA though11 G
SG 1.075
2-Row 23#
Cara-pils 1.5#
Crystal 35 .5#
Wheat 1#
Cane sugar 3#
FWH Warrior 1.75 ozs
CTZ Extract 10ml 90 minutes
CTZ Extract 10ml 45 minutes
Simcoe 1 oz 15 minutes
Centennial 2.5 ozs 1 minute
Simco 1 oz 1 minute
Amarillo 1.25 ozs 1 minute
20 minute whirlpool
Dry 1
Columbus 1 oz
Simco 1.25 oz
Centennial .75
Amarillo 1 oz
Dry 2
Columbus ,50 oz
Centennial .50 oz
Simco .50 oz
Amarillo .50 oz
Anyone brewing during this long weekend?
#21
Posted 13 February 2016 - 07:08 PM
#22
Posted 14 February 2016 - 01:57 PM
Cider is mixed up and done. Dopplebock is in the bucket at 1.090I'm setting up tomorrow for a double brew day. Dopplebock for a fall event, and a mid level Scottish for March. Also starting a cider "kit" for the ladies for the March event, and a new wine kit for the Mrs as long as I'm getting buckets etc ready.
Scottish first runnings are in the kettle, as soon as the sparge joins it, I'll mix up the wifes wine kit. A good day in the northland.
Edited by DieselGopher, 14 February 2016 - 01:59 PM.
#23
Posted 14 February 2016 - 02:33 PM
You planning to boil down the first runnings a bit before sparging?Cider is mixed up and done. Dopplebock is in the bucket at 1.090
Scottish first runnings are in the kettle, as soon as the sparge joins it, I'll mix up the wifes wine kit. A good day in the northland.
#24
Posted 14 February 2016 - 02:41 PM
You planning to boil down the first runnings a bit before sparging?
I pulled about a gallon off, they are on the stove. I think the house smells lovely....
#25
Posted 14 February 2016 - 02:45 PM
I pulled about a gallon off, they are on the stove. I think the house smells lovely....
I like the added complexity doing this adds, really goes well is Scottish styles
#26
Posted 14 February 2016 - 02:48 PM
I like the added complexity doing this adds, really goes well is Scottish styles
How far do you like to boil down that first gallon? How would one do this when doing no-sparge (BIAB)… take 2 gallons and reduce to the same volume as you spargers are reducing one gallon to?
#27
Posted 14 February 2016 - 02:50 PM
How far do you like to boil down that first gallon? How would one do this when doing no-sparge (BIAB)… take 2 gallons and reduce to the same volume as you spargers are reducing one gallon to?
Boiling down to about half of the first runnings.
#28
Posted 14 February 2016 - 03:06 PM
Boiling down to about half of the first runnings.
So, in your case, you would run-off lets say... 4 gallons of first runnings and the boil that down to 2 gallons then sparge the grain and top off with water to your normal pre-boil volume?
#29
Posted 14 February 2016 - 03:33 PM
So, in your case, you would run-off lets say... 4 gallons of first runnings and the boil that down to 2 gallons then sparge the grain and top off with water to your normal pre-boil volume?
No more like the first 1-2 gallons as you want the high gravity stuff, boil that down then sparge as normal. Just design the recipe to account for this additional boil off.
#30
Posted 14 February 2016 - 05:21 PM
Cider is mixed up and done. Dopplebock is in the bucket at 1.090
Scottish first runnings are in the kettle, as soon as the sparge joins it, I'll mix up the wifes wine kit. A good day in the northland.
Nice! I did a BDSA today that finished at 1.090. What is your fall event?
#31
Posted 14 February 2016 - 05:24 PM
Nice! I did a BDSA today that finished at 1.090. What is your fall event?
Wife and I host a fall party every year. Tons of homebrew, and usually 40 lbs butts. Everyone else brings sides, desserts, and munchies. 30-50 people depending on which weekend.
#32
Posted 15 February 2016 - 08:18 AM
#33
Posted 15 February 2016 - 09:27 AM
why are you both going for big beers with it?
I'm not...it's gonna be pils-ish. 10 lb. of grain for 5.5 gal. of beer should put me under 1.050
Boiling down to about half of the first runnings.
I boil the gal. down to less than a qt.
#34
Posted 15 February 2016 - 12:14 PM
I guess I figured imperial lager yeast meant an imperial beer.
#35
Posted 15 February 2016 - 02:00 PM
I guess I figured imperial lager yeast meant an imperial beer.
Sorry...Imperial is the name of the yeast company. https://www.imperialyeast.com/
#36
Posted 15 February 2016 - 02:07 PM
Sorry...Imperial is the name of the yeast company. https://www.imperialyeast.com/
well that's confusing
happy brewing!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users