Do we have any substantive evidence at this point that this actually improves our product?
Denny has some testers set up to brew batches where one is brewtan and one is not and then there will be tasters to give some feedback. I have mentioned a number of times that I think that brewtan may do different things for different brewers based on their water, their equipment and their processes. Someone whose equipment allows for water and grains to be mixed slowly and quietly (less splashing and stirring) may not see that brewtan is doing much. This situation where the brewtan is reacting with something and turning the water bluish or greenish is another indication that different brewers will get different results with it. The blue & green may be nothing and in the end the beer may just come out as the brewer intended and we'll have to wait for the results. For me, I make a lot of styles that are on the delicate side... helles, pils, American lager, kolsch, festbier, Vienna lager, dunkel, blonde ales, etc. What I get from brewtan is a softer and smoother finish in the beer. Prior to using it, I would experience some harshness in the finish that might range from very, very subtle all the way up to almost undrinkable. I don't know if it was oxidation, something that I did in my splashing & stirring throughout the brewday or what. I have combined the brewtan with using an SS chiller instead of copper, I have bypassed secondary and instead go from primary directly to kegs, I started purging my kegs with CO2 and I have also started conditioning my malt. I feel like I'm making the best beer I have ever made in the last 17+ years of brewing. I did change a number of things at the same time so I can't say that what I'm experiencing is
all brewtan.