How much Acid Malt or Lactic Acid before it is noticeable?
#21
Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:40 AM
#22
Posted 22 June 2017 - 05:02 AM
Downloaded ES Water to see what that comes up with. All three give me the same final values but each has a different pH value. I am going to go with this and see what I get and compare.
9# pils
1.5g Gypsum
1g CaCl
5ml Lactic
this will give me
Ca - 47
Cl - 55
SO4 - 41
pH predictions are 5.36,5.37 and 5.44
#23
Posted 22 June 2017 - 05:08 AM
drez, that profile and predicted pH look fine; at the very least, it's a good starting point for when you re-brew this recipe.
As always, some pics of the final product would be lovely.
#24
Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:12 AM
Downloaded ES Water to see what that comes up with. All three give me the same final values but each has a different pH value. I am going to go with this and see what I get and compare.
9# pils
1.5g Gypsum
1g CaCl
5ml Lactic
this will give me
Ca - 47
Cl - 55
SO4 - 41
pH predictions are 5.36,5.37 and 5.44
Did this yesterday and none of the pH estimates came close.
Mash time = 5min pH = 5.24
Mash time = 35min pH = 5.41
Pre-boil pH - 5.49
In fermenter pH = 5.48
I guess Bru'n Water was the closest today. In the end it will be fine.
#25
Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:22 AM
Yes, I can try that test. For the Patersbier I was thinking I would want that final pH to give me that nice "snap".
I'm looking for PH in the low 4's for the final number. I use up to 10% of Acid Malt.
Edited by BlKtRe, 26 June 2017 - 07:23 AM.
#26
Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:29 AM
I'm looking for PH in the low 4's for the final number. I use up to 10% of Acid Malt.
I agree with that. While I still have some acid malt kicking around I have moved towards lactic just because it is easier to predict and no variance batch to batch.
#27
Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:49 AM
Same. I have acid malt but rarely use it. I just don't see the point when I have lactic acid available.I agree with that. While I still have some acid malt kicking around I have moved towards lactic just because it is easier to predict and no variance batch to batch.
#28
Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:56 AM
I have a bunch of AM from a group buy. I guess I've never experienced fluctuations when using it. I do see LA would be easier to use but I'm already standing at my mill so no big deal.
#29
Posted 26 June 2017 - 08:04 AM
Same. I have acid malt but rarely use it. I just don't see the point when I have lactic acid available.
I keep telling myself I'll just use up the small amount I have but then I get lazy and use lactic acid.
#30
Posted 26 June 2017 - 08:10 AM
If I had 20 pounds of it or something, I would use it. I buy it in 1-pound bags and my guess is that I have a pound or less at this point. I should probably just toss it into an upcoming batch to get the gravity out of it and then wash my hands of it.I keep telling myself I'll just use up the small amount I have but then I get lazy and use lactic acid.
#31
Posted 26 June 2017 - 08:11 AM
If I had 20 pounds of it or something, I would use it. I buy it in 1-pound bags and my guess is that I have a pound or less at this point. I should probably just toss it into an upcoming batch to get the gravity out of it and then wash my hands of it.
yeup.
#32
Posted 26 June 2017 - 08:31 AM
#33
Posted 26 June 2017 - 09:10 AM
I let bru'n water do the pH predicting for me. 1/2 lb of acid malt in a 5 gal batch doesn't sound too crazy to me.
#34
Posted 26 June 2017 - 09:23 AM
#35
Posted 26 June 2017 - 12:43 PM
All I know is that on my light colored beers with my water, I always use 4 oz of AM, and I'm assuming the pH is fine because I get about 80% eff.
#36
Posted 26 June 2017 - 12:50 PM
All I know is that on my light colored beers with my water, I always use 4 oz of AM, and I'm assuming the pH is fine because I get about 80% eff.
it's unclear to me how high or low you can go before efficiency actually starts to suffer. the main question would be, "does the beer taste good?" if the answer is yes I wouldn't worry about it.
#37
Posted 26 June 2017 - 12:56 PM
#38
Posted 26 June 2017 - 02:28 PM
it's unclear to me how high or low you can go before efficiency actually starts to suffer. the main question would be, "does the beer taste good?" if the answer is yes I wouldn't worry about it.
it does taste good... and not worried... but, in general, yes I would agree
#39
Posted 27 June 2017 - 03:58 AM
It seems like the mash pH is for efficiency... the conversion of starches to sugars so 5.2 to 5.4 is the zone. For me, the sparge pH is to make sure that water and grains won't be mixed together at a pH higher than 6.0 were tannin extraction could occur and turn your beer into a dreadful trainwreck. The kettle pH usually lines up as long as the first two are good but that one might be for a flavor component. I rarely adjust the pH of the wort sitting in the kettle because it's ordinarily in the 5.2 to 5.3 range which I'm calling good for the boil.
I can't be fully certain but I think I often end up on the low side of pH. no problems here.
#40
Posted 27 June 2017 - 04:53 AM
I can't be fully certain but I think I often end up on the low side of pH. no problems here.
Wish I had that problem. I tend to end up on the high side.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users