Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Lagunita Sumpin Wild


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Jdtirado

Jdtirado

    Comptroller of Betties & Crocs

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2162 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 07 August 2014 - 05:53 AM

Anyone have this recipe?



#2 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9092 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 07 August 2014 - 08:19 AM

I'm looking for it, too!  I'll let ya know if I turn anything up.



#3 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18067 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:41 AM

Anyone have this recipe?

Here is a place to start

 

Can You Brew it Little Sumpin':https://thebrewingne...k.com/shows/705

 

Lagunitas Description of Little Sumpin' Wild:

A higher gravity seasonal version of the year-round Little Sumpin’ Sumpin’ Ale. It’s made with Westmalle Trappist yeast that creates those curious phenolic off-flavors that are freakin’ everyone out these days. Massively dosed with boatloads of wheat and pale malt and finishes with a big, hoppy ending.

 

recipe from the podcast:

 

OG 1070
FG ?
IBUs 34.7
SRM 4.8

3.68kg US 2-row 50%
2.77kg wheat malt 37.6%
90g home toasted wheat malt 1.2%
830g torrified wheat 11.2%

Boil for 90min

11g Nugget 9%AA at 90min
2g Horizon 12%AA at 90min
2g Summit 17.5%AA at 90min
8g Willamete 5.2%AA at 45min
27g Santiam 5.6%AA at 15min
9g Willamete at 15min

24g Cascade dry hop
24g Centennial dry hop
24g Simcoe dry hop
24g Chinook dry hop
18g Amarillo dry hop
15g Columbus dry hop

WLP002

Mash at 150F

Pitch at 62F, raise to 68 after 36', then raise to 70F after another 36'.

Discussion notes:
The wheat is toasted to approximately 14lov



#4 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16614 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:52 AM

Boil for 90min

11g Nugget 9%AA at 90min 2g Horizon 12%AA at 90min 2g Summit 17.5%AA at 90min

Somebody school me here. Why? This seems highly unnecessary from the perspective of a home brewer, no?



#5 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 07 August 2014 - 10:57 AM

Somebody school me here. Why? This seems highly unnecessary from the perspective of a home brewer, no?

 

I'd tend to agree.  it's a rare case where I use more than one type of hop for a 60-90 min addition.



#6 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18067 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:03 AM

Somebody school me here. Why? This seems highly unnecessary from the perspective of a home brewer, no?

I agree, I would just go with one bittering hop. 

I'd tend to agree.  it's a rare case where I use more than one type of hop for a 60-90 min addition.

For me it is only when I want a slight rough edge to the bittering and will mix in maybe 25% of something like Chinook with a more smoother hop like magnum or Apollo



#7 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:03 AM

I agree, I would just go with one bittering hop. 

For me it is only when I want a slight rough edge to the bittering and will mix in maybe 25% of something like Chinook with a more smoother hop like magnum or Apollo

 

that would be the one case where I've done this.



#8 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16614 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:05 AM

I'd tend to agree.  it's a rare case where I use more than one type of hop for a 60-90 min addition.

I mean to be honest I have no idea what flavors Nugget and Summit are going to leave behind after 90 min. So maybe there is something there. But 2g of clean Horizon @90 min? Really?

 

I agree, I would just go with one bittering hop. 

For me it is only when I want a slight rough edge to the bittering and will mix in maybe 25% of something like Chinook with a more smoother hop like magnum or Apollo

Yeah me too.

 

We've talked about this before, but yeah, same mix here too. Chinook has a very definable signature when used for bittering.



#9 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:09 AM

We've talked about this before, but yeah, same mix here too. Chinook has a very definable signature when used for bittering.

 

I have an IPA (more like a bitter pale ale since I didn't bother to dry hop the second keg of it) I bittered with chinook.  it def has that going on.  at first I didn't really like it but it's kind of grown on me as I work my way through the keg.  strange how that works.



#10 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18067 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:19 AM

Somebody school me here. Why? This seems highly unnecessary from the perspective of a home brewer, no?

I have noticed they do a similar hopping on a few of their other beers.  Censored for examples uses 86% Willamette and 14% Horizon at 60.  I guess it is just their thing, similar to high mash temperatures.



#11 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9092 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:34 AM

I'd brew it just like the recipe the first time...and I probably will brew it before too long.  How do you know something can or should be changed without a baseline to compare it to?



#12 MyaCullen

MyaCullen

    Cheap Blue Meanie

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68757 posts
  • LocationSpokane, WA

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:41 AM

I'd brew it just like the recipe the first time...and I probably will brew it before too long.  How do you know something can or should be changed without a baseline to compare it to?

agreed, or as close to it as your system and process will accomodate



#13 HVB

HVB

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18067 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:42 AM

I'd brew it just like the recipe the first time...and I probably will brew it before too long.  How do you know something can or should be changed without a baseline to compare it to?

I also brew it the way the recipe states the first time before making changes but I think the suggestion that a hop blend for bittering is not going to have a huge difference on the final product is a valid one.  Especially a beer that has a big dry hop.  If I did not have Nugget or Summit I would not have any heartburn about just making the appropriate addition of Magnum and call it good.



#14 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:43 AM

the main reason not to do it is it's extra hops.  I tend to buy 1lb at a time.  it might make a difference though - who knows!



#15 neddles

neddles

    No Life

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 16614 posts

Posted 07 August 2014 - 11:48 AM

I am not brewing it. I guess I was just trying to tap the collective experience here on wether or not a complicated 90 min bittering addition was something that would be noticed. I hear a lot of keep it simple advice so I guess I was trying to see if the complexity here was worth the trouble. If I were to brew it I don't think I would go out of my way to acquire 2g each of Summit and Horizon if I didn't already have them. But I could be convinced otherwise if someone can explain that it matters and why.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users