Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Temperature differences within the kettle


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

#21 codemonkey

codemonkey

    Ass. Comptroller of Ferthdays

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18916 posts
  • LocationMy suburban paradise

Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:41 AM

I get the no boil/no hops part. I was confused about the 'continued conversion during fermentation'.

Without the boil or a mashout, the enzymes aren't denatured so they can continue breaking up the starches.

have you taken the gravity of the first running?  that would allow you to determine what kind of conversion you are getting.

I have in the past. Don't have the numbers handy but it was typically around 1.100 for a 20# mash.



#22 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:45 AM

I have in the past. Don't have the numbers handy but it was typically around 1.100 for a 20# mash.

 

did you calculate how close to 100% conversion it was?



#23 codemonkey

codemonkey

    Ass. Comptroller of Ferthdays

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18916 posts
  • LocationMy suburban paradise

Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:47 AM

did you calculate how close to 100% conversion it was?

nope, I don't know how to do that :)



#24 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:50 AM

nope, I don't know how to do that :)

 

okay then!  do you use any brewing software?  that could help you figure it out. you'd need to know how much strike water and grain and the potential of the grain.

 

here is a nice overview:  https://braukaiser.c...ding_Efficiency


Edited by Evil_Morty, 27 October 2014 - 06:54 AM.


#25 djinkc

djinkc

    Comptroller of Non-Defending Defenders of Inarticulate Twats

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 32138 posts
  • Locationout the backdoor

Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:54 AM

Since your sparge volume is lower and there is no concentration from boil off I would think efficiency would tank some.  How much I don't know.



#26 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 06:56 AM

here is the equation you want:

 

Posted Image

 

 

or even better just put your mash thickness into this table and then divide your first wort gravity by the max predicted gravity.

 

Posted Image


Edited by Evil_Morty, 27 October 2014 - 07:01 AM.


#27 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 07:18 AM

where did everyone go!  I thought we were finally getting somewhere.

 

any time someone is having trouble with efficiency the first step should be to determine what their conversion is like.



#28 codemonkey

codemonkey

    Ass. Comptroller of Ferthdays

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18916 posts
  • LocationMy suburban paradise

Posted 27 October 2014 - 07:22 AM

where did everyone go!  I thought we were finally getting somewhere.

 

any time someone is having trouble with efficiency the first step should be to determine what their conversion is like.

Lol, sorry, stupid job....

 

Thanks for the link, I'll take a look later on. I'm going to try to brew this evening so this should be insightful.



#29 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 07:26 AM

Lol, sorry, stupid job....

 

Thanks for the link, I'll take a look later on. I'm going to try to brew this evening so this should be insightful.

 

what's funny is I've never checked this myself :lol:



#30 SchwanzBrewer

SchwanzBrewer

    Grand Duke of Inappropriate Announcements

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34299 posts
  • LocationKnee deep in business plans

Posted 27 October 2014 - 07:51 AM

What kind of malt are you using?



#31 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:02 AM

What kind of malt are you using?

 

it's another good question.  are you thinking diastatic power or something else?



#32 codemonkey

codemonkey

    Ass. Comptroller of Ferthdays

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18916 posts
  • LocationMy suburban paradise

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:06 AM

100% Briess 2-row for this batch.



#33 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:07 AM

100% Briess 2-row for this batch.

 

should convert just fine then.



#34 SchwanzBrewer

SchwanzBrewer

    Grand Duke of Inappropriate Announcements

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34299 posts
  • LocationKnee deep in business plans

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:23 AM

100% Briess 2-row for this batch.

 

What are you mashing in?



#35 codemonkey

codemonkey

    Ass. Comptroller of Ferthdays

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18916 posts
  • LocationMy suburban paradise

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:24 AM

What are you mashing in?

48 qt igloo cube with a ss braid.



#36 ChicagoWaterGuy

ChicagoWaterGuy

    Frequent Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3234 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:28 AM

I think your best bet would be to try adding a third sparge. You're leaving a lot of sugar in the tun.



#37 codemonkey

codemonkey

    Ass. Comptroller of Ferthdays

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 18916 posts
  • LocationMy suburban paradise

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:33 AM

I think your best bet would be to try adding a third sparge. You're leaving a lot of sugar in the tun.

Agreed, but I don't have the capacity. Ideally I want 5 gallons of 8.5% "beer." Scotch distilleries typically do two sparges into the fermenter, and then use the 3rd sparge (2nd aftermash) as strike water for the next mash.

 

I'm open to the idea that I really might not have as bad of a problem as I think, given the volume limitations as well as the lack of a condensing boil. The problem, though, is that even when I was making regular beer I never got good numbers, so I don't really have a good reference point.



#38 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9092 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:52 AM

Say what? Must be something I don't understand here. Can you clarify the bold?

 

Yep.  I can't think of any way conversion could be taking place during fermentation.



#39 denny

denny

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9092 posts
  • LocationEugene OR

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:55 AM

nope, I don't know how to do that :)

 

Go down the column for liquor/grist ratio.  Compare what this chart says is the max to what you get.

 

Posted Image



#40 positiveContact

positiveContact

    Anti-Brag Queen

  • Patron
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68886 posts
  • LocationLimbo

Posted 27 October 2014 - 08:57 AM

I think your best bet would be to try adding a third sparge. You're leaving a lot of sugar in the tun.

 

those have been shown to be of limited benefit but maybe for a really high gravity situation it could help I guess.

Go down the column for liquor/grist ratio.  Compare what this chart says is the max to what you get.

 

Posted Image

 

oh you mean like this?  :lol:

 

 

here is the equation you want:

 

Posted Image

 

 

or even better just put your mash thickness into this table and then divide your first wort gravity by the max predicted gravity.

 

Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users